Terminator: Dark Fate (2019)

darkfWe’re currently in a period -have been for quite some time, actually, and it seems there’s no end in sight- where pop culture seems obsessed with the past. With re-visiting old icons. Its actually been going on in film for so long now that one could be forgiven for thinking its just always been this way, that this is normal and entirely intellectually ‘sound’. Its gotten to the point at which, having remade and rebooted so many huge successful properties of the past, attention has turned to those that failed first time around; I still have to pinch myself that anyone deemed it a good idea to make a sequel to Blade Runner, box-office flop that it was. News has been circulating recently that John Carpenter’s 1982 flop The Thing is being remade/rebooted. I suppose so many years has gone by that the financial failures of those two 1982 duds has been softened by decades of ancillary sales on various video formats and platforms, and their critical reappraisal won’t have hurt either. But the performance of BR2049 should always be a sobering reminder of the dangers, even if it turned out (in my eyes, anyway) a quite brilliant film possibly equal to the original. So you know, maybe a remake/reboot of The Thing is not the monstrously horrible idea that my gut instinct thinks it is.

The Terminator franchise is one of those properties that Hollywood just hasn’t been able to quite leave alone, but by the time Terminator: Dark Fate arrived one had to wonder whether film-makers were rebooting/continuing the original two films or the successive sequels/reboots. It had gotten to the point at which my apathy left me curious about it, but not enough to actually shell out any coins to watch it. Which might be why the film failed -with a slightly higher budget than BR2049 it barely surpassed that films likewise dismal worldwide box-office, perhaps some measure of just how little any of those old movies actually resonate with modern audiences, no matter how good/bad/popular they were originally.

To be brutally honest, Terminator: Dark Fate is a totally unnecessary movie. Its like Terminator is some Hollywood corpse that keeps on getting kicked around, or which some mad Hollywood studio executive scientist keeps subjecting to lightning screaming “Its alive! Its alive!”until finally realising, no, its still quite dead and kicks it into a dark corner again until some other Peter Cushing lookalike decides its worth a shot.

Maybe this time is the last time. Maybe this time they’ll let it lie.

Its not that Terminator: Dark Fate is a bad film – well, maybe it is, but at least it isn’t terrible- its just that its so redundant, just bringing back the old tropes and stunts and, in this case, two of the original actors/characters. The whole franchise has gotten so wrapped up in various timelines and realities and paradoxes that the first thing this film does is wipe out everything post T2 in one brutal opening sequence to, as it were, simply clear the state. Unfortunately at the same time it also pulls an Alien 3, by pretty much negating everything in T2 itself, too. Which is either very brave or incredibly stupid- some Alien fans still get dangerously fluctuating blood pressure issues when Alien 3 is ever raised in a discussion.  For the record, I’m a fan of Alien 3 and quite like the sheer audacity of what it did to the characters who survived Aliens, but I have always been able to appreciate the ire that fans invested in the characters of Aliens felt at the time and indeed still do. Intellectually it wholly undermines the events of that film, threatening to negate any investment in that film whenever re-watched (possibly fans instead watch and stubbornly (wisely?) ignore the fact that Alien 3 exists at all- something that likely quite a few original Star Wars trilogy fans are attempting in this Disney Star Wars era.

darkf3What Terminator: Dark Fate proposes is that all the efforts of Sarah Connor and Arnie’s reprogrammed Terminator to protect her son John from the shape-shifting T-1000 and destroy Skynet were all for nothing, because in the first five minutes another Terminator (several, it seems, having been sent into the past to kill John Connor because, well, redundancy) comes along and kills John shortly following the events of T2. Its perhaps saying something about the inevitability of fate and AI that although Skynet has been stopped, it is instead simply delaying the same Apocalyptic events, this time orchestrated by another, later AI entitled Legion.

Now on the one hand, this is a fascinating proposition- similarly to the mythology of the BSG reboot, it seems to be suggesting that whatever we do, humanity is doomed to repeat the same mistake, in that the drive/forward momentum of scientific advancement we are always destined to create machines and then AI which, when sentient, always turns against us. In BSG, what has happened before is destined to happen again, a cycle of advance and disaster. So that defeating Skynet in T2 is always futile because some other scientist is going to eventually stumble upon the knowledge that leads to AI and another Skynet- in Dark Fate‘s case, an AI called Legion. It suggests a particularly dark viewpoint, the nihilistic view that humanity is doomed whatever we do. This isn’t really dwelt upon, more the pity, because Dark Fate lacks the darkness of the first Terminator film in particular The one thing I did appreciate, is that Dark Fate actually offers a possible break in the cycle: the issue with T2 was that it ended Skynet but not the industrial/economic drive for scientific progress that led to Skynet (because Judgement Day never happened,  the lesson of Skynet couldn’t be heeded by the public/powers that be). Dark Fate is never about stopping Judgement Day, it happens eventually, and Dani is the leader to lead the resistance and defeat Legion. One would suppose that afterwards, whatever the world is like, its one in which scientists won’t be so eager to create AI that threatens the Apocalypse.

So, decades after John has been killed and Sarah lost in semi-drunken rage, two new Terminators arrive from the future- well, one, as it turns out, is not quite a Terminator, but the other is a black-liquid T-1000 variant obviously up to no good- and the basic plot of the Terminator movies is up and running again. The AI of the ‘Future End of the World (Delayed)’ has identified the human that usurps it in its future and has sent a deadly assassin into the past to kill her and ensure it isn’t, er, usurped. And, er, someone else has then sent someone into the past to ensure she, er, isn’t.

darkf2Its like the very definition of reboot. And of course, it perhaps reflects the current obsession of our times that the hero that can save humanity is a woman not a man, and that the ‘good’ Terminator sent into the past (actually an augmented human, named Grace) is a woman too. I’m not concerned with the sexual politics, its boring and largely irrelevant except for those that choose to make a Big Deal about it on YouTube etc (afterall, we had Ripley and Sarah Connor herself kicking ass in films 40-odd years ago so its really the same old, same old). But the gender choices do impact the casting, and its that casting that chiefly damages this film. On the one hand, Mackenzie Davis as Grace is great – she’s excellent at the physical work in the action sequences and she is a very fine actress so is emotive and is, really, the highlight of the film. Unfortunately, while Natalia Reyes, who plays Dani, the Dark Fate variant of John Connor, is probably a good actress in her own right, she never at all convinces as the future saviour of the human race. She doesn’t have the hardness or physical attributes to really convince that way, particularly (and most damningly) in the future sequences in which we see her leading the resistance against Legion. Maybe it was an attempt to cast against type, but it doesn’t work, at least it didn’t for me. To be honest, it was almost laughable, and her future leader proves even more unconvincing than her present-day unwitting factory worker destined for Greatmess. As if ‘anyone’ can be The One.

Arnie, of course, is back, as the Terminator that assassinated John at the films opening but is later redeemed by living with humans and getting a conscience. Yeah, I know, even typing that feels stupid, but its one of those leaps of logic that Dark Fate inflicts upon us in its strange insistence to stay positive about everything- the film really misses the darkness of the first film. This Terminator seems to have even adopted a family and had success selling Drapes. Excuse me while I barf… I don’t know. Maybe they should have written a backstory of Sarah hunting the Terminator down for revenge, capturing and reprogramming it as her robot-slave or something, or maybe that would paint her in a bad light. Speaking of Sarah Connor, Linda Hamilton makes a welcome return as the great haunted anti-heroine, but again, she utterly lacks any chemistry with Reyes as Dani, I mean, there is literally nothing there.

Its like the film lacks any emotional depth or profundity at all, and that Reyes is this strange Black Hole when the character really needs to be an icon, a gravitational force of depth and substance. Only Mackenzie Davis seems to make any real connection with Reyes or Hamilton or anyone, really. Arnie is pretty much wasted, he gets a few funny gags/one-liners but its not as if the film has a dark mood to alleviate. Without the emotional connections there really can’t be any drama, and some of the decidedly ropy CGI work in the stunts with digital characters substituting for the actors and their stunt doubles while plainly necessary is so poorly done, and sticks out so badly, it just seems to turn it into an animated movie so minus any real tension.

Its bad enough that we’ve largely seen so much of this before, but the films tendency to try to do action sequences up there with the daftest Marvel Studios spandex hero nonsense just makes it, well, silly, totally lacking any weight or depth. It really needed, in my opinion, to return to the physical reality of the first movie, and a violence that looked real and hurt, away from the Marvel stuff that threatens to infect everything now.

Dark Fate is not a complete disaster, but its really not particularly good either, completely negating any reason for its existence, even if it could argue for one in the first place. Did we need another Terminator movie? If we did, we needed one better than Dark Fate.

7 thoughts on “Terminator: Dark Fate (2019)

  1. Matthew McKinnon

    Did you get to the end of that post and feel a slight hollow sadness at the time you wasted writing it?

    Not that you’re wrong – you’ve nailed the pointlessness of T6 perfectly; just that it’s so redundant that even watching it, never mind writing about it, feels like a grievous waste of precious life. The fact that it’s not entirely terrible – as you say, Davies is great and Arnie has possibly the funniest lines of the entire series – makes it somehow more milquetoast.

    Neat observation about Alien 3, though. It never occurred to me how much this T6 setup mirrored the deaths of Hicks and Newt. Interesting that Cameron was quite vocal about hating that back in 1992, but happy to do it himself now. Presumably he thinks it’s daring when he does it.

    As a footnote, I was an obsessive Alien and Aliens fan when 3 was in development and I welcomed those deaths, and the direction Alien 3 went in (if not the actual execution, which – lets’s be honest – is severely compromised). As much as I love/loved Aliens, I didn’t want any more movies like that because it couldn’t possibly be improved on as an action movie. The idea of another shoot-em-up sequel was the most boring and crowd-pleasing way you could possibly have gone.

    Nowadays I can watch Alien 3 two different ways. A friend once pointed out that the character and story arc of Alien and Aliens is tidy and satisfying in itself, another film wasn’t ‘required’ to ‘complete’ anything, so the two opposing ideas of a great pair of movies with an interesting footnote and/or a Ripley trilogy can co-exist easily in my head without any dissonance.

    1. Its the trouble with all this stream-of-consciousness blogging, I either can’t think of anything worthwhile to say, or spin off on a wild tangent, or, as in this case, invest too much time and effort on something that doesn’t merit it. I genuinely feel sorry for Mackenzie Davis; this was likely her one shot at something major, a lead in a big genre action flick, and it just collapses all around her for no fault of her own. As if the failure of BR2049 wasn’t enough.

      Regards Aliens/Alien 3 etc- these days after Prometheus and Alien: Covenant, I actually just prefer to think of Alien as just one unique film that never had any sequels/prequels at all. Helps maintain the Lovecraftian mystery and mood. Seeing the wonderful enigmatic Space Jockey and then considering its a 12-foot bald guy in a silly spacesuit is just more than I can bear. Thank God Ridley stayed away from revising Blade Runner, bad enough his nonsense about Deckard being a replicant.

  2. You made a good point comparing the death in Dark Fate to Alien 3. How I hated all those needless deaths! You made some excellent observations, but I liked it a bit more as I am a huge fan of Sarah Connor/Linda Hamilton. I would have skipped the movie if it didn’t have her in it.

    1. I know that its far from what these Terminator films are, but wouldn’t it have been nice to have had a genuine, thoughtful character piece/study of Sarah Connor twenty years after T2 and her life ‘now’, what she became afterwards? You know, a film in which Sarah Connor hasn’t got to look cool with a shotgun or hefting a bazooka? For all that genre films like to have a pretence of maturity (what qualifies as dialogue moments in a Marvel movie), it consistently lacks the daring to just splash a comparatively small amount of money on something that might mean something, have something to say about the human condition, or someone post-trauma having survived something like T2. A small budget would mean it wouldn’t have to be a smash to break even- hell, it could even go straight to Netflix and be perfectly fine financially.

      For that matter, for all Dark Fate’s faults, I wouldn’t mind seeing a 90-minute prequel movie of Arnie’s Terminator, after killing John Connor, settling down and ‘adopting’ his family, acting human and over the years becoming human, at last to some extent. It was an implausible leap of logic in Dark Fate, but there could be a nice emotional, witty film just there. Almost a nod back to Arnie’s comedy turns. No action, just drama and reflection. It could actually be interesting, handled properly with subtle care, and a nice send-off for Arnie’s Terminator persona and what he, as a screen icon, represents to genre fans.

      Mind, most people reading this would likely think such a thing as horrible no doubt!

      1. I like all your ideas of how Terminator should have or could in the future do character studies of Sarah or the original Terminator, but you know they never will. The Terminator movies, for better or for worse, are always big action packed movies done in broad strokes.

  3. Pingback: Last Week – the ghost of 82

  4. Pingback: The 2020 List: September – the ghost of 82

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s