Lady Macbeth (2016)

dy1.jpgThis is a strange one, and perhaps one of those where what you get out of it depends upon how you approach it. Ostensibly a period drama, I went into it expecting something like a revisionary Jane Eyre, akin, as perhaps the title might suggest, to the rework of Shakespeare’s Macbeth that was Justin Kurzel’s 2015 film. As it turned out, I wasn’t far off, but it still came as something of a surprise/shock.

The Shakespeare angle, you see, is something of a red herring. Actually based on an 1895 novel by Russian author Nikolai Leskov,  Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District, itself inspired by Shakespeare’s Macbeth, this film by William Oldroyd transplants the original book’s Russian locale to nineteenth century Northern England. Florence Pugh, who is pretty mesmerizing throughout,  plays Katherine, a young woman who is married off to Alexander (Paul Hilton), the son of a wealthy mine-owner,  Boris (Christopher Fairbank), who has arranged the marriage like some kind of land-deal. While we see the wedding service, we don’t see Alexander, the focus purely on Katherine who looks lost, a fish out of water, as if she has been transplanted to some other world she does not understand.  When we eventually do see Alexander, it is on the wedding night, which proves disastrous, the wedding unconsummated. And it all goes downhill from there- lies, betrayal, adultery, murder.

I have seen the film referred to as a Victorian Noir, and that pretty much nails it. This is a twisted, subversive tale that is part period drama and part horror tale. It isn’t perfect – much of the character motivations are too lightly skimmed over, so that the characters suddenly seem to take actions that are out of left-field and so don’t wholly convince. Overall, the film therefore feels rather disjointed- Pugh is, as I’ve noted, pretty mesmerizing and she easily dominates the whole thing, but even then, her own actions often feel unexplained at times and its hard to sympathize with her in the latter half. Initially she is clearly the victim but by turns she becomes the villain, utterly without any redemption at the end. I suppose that is perhaps the whole point of the film -and the Macbeth in the title- but it feels a little unearned. We don’t really get ‘into’ her psyche.

Certainly well worth a watch though.

5 thoughts on “Lady Macbeth (2016)

  1. I saw this in the cinema when it came out and remember summing up the experience in one word when posting about the experience on an online forum. The word I used was grim.
    I can’t say I enjoyed it; I found it relentless in its darkness and meanness. It’s well enough made but there’s nothing positive in it or to be taken away from it. As I said, grim.

  2. Matthew McKinnon

    I’ll join the consensus here: I watched this last year and I thought it was admirably downbeat but a bit drab overall, and hasty and unbelievable towards the end.

  3. This has been on my “to watch” list for a while, based on purely on hearing it was good and Florence Pugh is a rising star, which is probably why I’ve not actually watched it — no idea what it was actually like or about! It does sound up my street, though perhaps one for a particular mood if it’s that grim and drab.

    1. Yes, certainly worth a watch, and the central performance of Pugh, who I don’t believe I have seen before, is pretty sensational in a kind of cool understated kind of way. There are some strong young actresses out there these days, it’ll be fascinating to see where they go (hopefully not a Tomb Raider film in her case).

  4. Pingback: Malevolent (2018) – the ghost of 82

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s