The Crown – Season One (2016)

crownAnother Elizabethan drama about a young Queen in a man’s world whose reign marks a turning point for the British Empire and the dawn of a new era. We’ve seen this before, right? Not exactly- we’re not going back to the 16th Century for one thing; this is far more recent history, for this story is about Elizabeth II, and the (miss)fortunes of a fading British Empire following the Second World War, and the role of the modern monarchy in this new world.

I will say this- I didn’t expect to enjoy this series as much as I did. As an historical drama recreating the 1930s/1940s and 1950s Britain, this is a very accomplished effort, not withstanding historical accuracy regards the Royal Family etc. It is clearly drama more than documentary -although there is some surprising truth in what it portrays- but it is very accomplished technically and the ten episodes are well written. For a modern epic drama it is pleasantly restrained regards graphic indulgence or sensalitionism. More Downtown Abbey then than Game of Thrones, to be sure, and none the worse for that. The contemporary tendency for television dramas to go for excess and strain credibility (as Hard Sun recently did) is in little evidence here. While it may seem more establishment fairytale than council estate reality, Americans lap this stuff up and us Brits often like to lose ourselves in Downton dreamland in the face of the present-day soap opera of Brexit Westminster.

Personally speaking I’m far from a Royalist and have little affection or interest in the modern generation of  privileged Royal elite that ‘graces’ our Isle, but all my life I have lived during the reign of Elizabeth II and its difficult to ignore the fact that she has been this constant figure in my lifetime, for good or ill.  She represents the England of my childhood of the 1960s and 1970s, particularly her Jubilee of 1977 when I was in the Scouts – we had a street party and felt a real sense of community that feels as long gone as, well, my childhood. The inevitable pangs of nostalgia mean something I guess, but in any event, I have, if not affection, then some grudging respect for her if only for what she represents of my childhood: those rose-tinted images of simpler times, less murky politics and social responsibilities. Certainly it is clear from the ten episodes of this first season (of six, apparently) that she has lived through historic times and seen/met many historic figures: perfect recipe for historical drama on television, anyway.

Claire Foy is excellent in the lead role (it seems such a long way from Little Dorrit) , though Dr Who seems rather bereft of his Tardis as the Duke of Edinburgh, but the real surprise is John LIthgow as the raging-against-ageing Winston Churchill, whose story proves just as interesting and involving as that of the Queen. If anyone were to tell me that Lithgow could pull off Churchill I wouldn’t have believed them, but he manages with considerable aplomb, damn near stealing the show. The strangest casting decisions sometimes work.

As a whole the rest of the cast manage well enough in fairly routine character roles that seldom really surprise but it is all very entertaining. In the old days this would be the staple of BBC drama and watching this I always had a nagging feeling that this sort of thing is exactly what the Beeb should be doing, but considering the cost and scale of this enterprise perhaps it’s just another sign of the changing times this being a Netflix production. It’s certainly is much better than I had originally expected and I quite look forward to seeing season two.

5 thoughts on “The Crown – Season One (2016)

  1. I seem to recall (i.e. I don’t think I’ve just made this up) that this was offered to, or even developed with, the Beeb, but they simply couldn’t afford it. Considering the insane sums Netflix have reportedly spent on it, that’s not surprising.

    I’m not sure it needed all that money (some of the overseas excursions, in particular, felt to me like throwing budget around because, hey, why not), but it is a surprisingly good series. Lithgow really is really excellent. I knew he was a good actor but I couldn’t see him as Churchill at all, but he completely disappears into the role.

    1. Yeah I saw the budget listed somewhere and thought, ‘well, that brought everyone new sports cars’ because the show itself wasn’t that huge in scale- it felt quite intimate and all the better for it. Maybe the money went on that cast. But I suppose as movie budgets get sillier and sillier it’s only natural that it happens in tv too, particularly with how ambitious tv programming is getting.

      1. Matthew McKinnon

        I think the budget covered a lot of the locations and sets – which were so frequently and unshowily used you stop noticing them. Were this a BBC show, you would have had a couple of big CGI-enhanced establishing shots with great BIG orchestral music: The Crown was far more subtle.

        £10 million isn’t that much per hour of TV when it’s as good as this. [imagine £15m budget for a decent period feature film – that’d be a steal!].

        I absolutely didn’t expect to, but I really loved this series. I was constantly surprised by how near it got to some of the more unsavoury aspects of the Windsors’ lives: that Elizabeth confronted Phillip about his infidelities was a real shocker – I never thought the show would dare go there.

  2. Pingback: Saving Mr Banks (2013) – the ghost of 82

  3. Pingback: The Crown Season Two (2017) – the ghost of 82

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s