Crooked House (2017)

A recording over the Christmas period that I’ve just caught up with. I’m not familiar at all with Agatha Christie’s work – I’ve not read any of her stories and not even seen any version of Murder on the Orient Express, for example-but I did see The Witness for the Prosecution which starred Toby Jones a few years ago (was that another Christmas special?) and And Then There Were None, which was a two-parter (or was it three?) on the BBC back in 2015 or 2016. I’m not sure if we are in some kind of revival or if she’s been an endlessly steady source of movie and television adaptations and I’ve just stumbled into watching them at last, but I am beginning to see some appeal.

Clearly Christie’s work is the murder mystery genre, in which there has been a murder with plenty of suspects for the reader and the chief protagonist to examine and deduct a likely culprit with an eventual reveal that has some element of surprise. I may likely be doing Christie a disservice with such a simple summary, but that’s my take anyway.  And they do seem to be kind of fun, while its a genre that’s not held much interest for me in the past. Perhaps these most recent adaptations that have turned up around Christmas time are the simplest entry point, as they seem to be very well made with taut scripts, direction amd very good casts.

Crooked House was on Channel Five and seems to be one of that breed of independent movies that are released theatrically in some territories and on television (or Netflix/Amazon) in others. So while it was a Channel Five premiere here in the UK  and may seem to be a Christmas tv movie it’s really got a bigger scale than that, certainly on the evidence of its rather remarkable cast. Glenn Close, Gillian Anderson, Christina Hendricks and Stefanie Martini supply the glam and the bitchiness whilst Julian Sands, Terence Stamp and Max Irons headline the male side of the ensemble. Inevitably with such a cast its easy to say the material doesn’t really do them justice- I suppose only Glenn Close and Terence Stamp really leave any lasting impression, more’s the pity. Watching it, I had the persistent feeling that the whole thing was beneath them.

Its hard not to complain that the whole thing felt rather formulaic, but I suppose that’s inherent in the source material/Christies works in general. It seemed well-intentioned and made with some effort but it didn’t really surprise me or really made me care much about anybody. That was most likely intentional of course, as I don’t think any of the characters were really likeable and by the nature of the genre they had to have motive enough to be a suspect. I think I would have preferred more focus on an individual with a chance to empathise with their singular perspective (like Toby Jones’ character in the much superior The Witness For The Prosecution) but that’s probably just indicating my limitations for this genre.

So as a way to spend a few hours over the festive season Crooked House was harmless enough but I doubt it will linger in any viewers thoughts now that Christmas has passed. I suspect the original book has a far more lasting effect.


4 thoughts on “Crooked House (2017)

  1. I haven’t seen this, and actually haven’t heard anything all that good about it, but the book does indeed linger in the memory for the envelope pushing audacity of the solution and conclusion.
    Of the recent Christie adaptations, I’ve only seen part (the first half?) of Witness, and I didn’t enjoy it, to be honest. I’m very familiar with a lot of her books and, while I’m not one of those types who gets uptight about liberties taken in transferring material from one medium to another, I feel the grim tone and very slow development does the stories a disservice. The books are, for the most part, devilishly clever but snappily told mysteries that create suspense and tension without the overdose of angst.
    From what I’ve heard, this version sticks to the same formula as those others that we got lately. As such, I don’t think I’ll be rushing out to look for it.

    1. There must be a tendency these days to ‘modernise’ or ‘toughen-up’ the original stories in an attempt to make them seem more relevant to modern audiences, even whilst keeping the stories set in their original period. I’m afraid it’s inevitable with audiences so fickle and the tv remote so handy. I’m sure there is an audience for shows with a slow pace and less sensationalism but it is likely an ever-shrinking audience.

      I’ve been watching the series Hard Sun (review upcoming I guess) and while I have been enjoying it, it is obvious that the makers are keeping one eye on what they are doing and another on what everyone is doing, and being influenced by it. Certainly the impact (if that is the word) of Game of Thrones on modern television and film is beginning to become evident. People seem more enamored by sudden twists and turns for sheer shock value than the benefits of coherence of plot these days- I blame GOT for many of the problems I have with The Last Jedi for instance.

      You have me intrigued about the original story, I may give it a look.

      1. Yes, definitely check out Christire’s book when you get an opportunity. It’s one of her best novels, although you find yourself becoming addicted to classic detective fiction!

  2. I was aware this was coming, but missed it in the schedule and then the reviews sounded terrible so I haven’t bothered to seek it out on catch-up or something.

    There do seem to be an increasing number of Christie adaptations popping up. I don’t know if someone new has taken over her estate, or if the end of Poirot and Marple on ITV kicked them into gear, or if it’s just a coincidence… The BBC are in the midst of doing seven new adaptations, of which And Then There Were None and Witness for the Prosecution were the first two (there was supposed to be a third this Christmas, but it was postponed due to accusations against one of the cast and now they’re pulling a Ridley and reshooting).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s