The Martian (2015)

marty1As I write this, Ridley Scott’s The Martian has reached a US domestic haul of more than $197 million, with foreign receipts added its worldwide take is some $459 million, making it one of the directors most successful films. It hasn’t been released in China or Japan yet either so there’s plenty yet to be added, so it is sure to cross that magical $500 million barrier. It’s nice to see Scott with a genuine hit under his hat after a decade of his films struggling to find a sizeable audience.

It’s just a pity its The Martian. It is easy to assess why it has been so successful- it is based on a very popular book, has a likeable and popular lead, and is pretty much the perfect Ridley Scott vehicle for mainstream audiences- a simple story told with great visuals. It’s a good movie. But it’s a pretty weak Ridley Scott movie. Think Thelma & Louise over 1492: Conquest of Paradise.

marty2Maybe ‘weak’ isn’t the right word. Its just that… well it didn’t involve me somehow. Maybe its unfair, I read the book so I knew what to expect. Other than an unnecessary coda the film is largely faithful to the book and doesn’t take any liberties so any weakness in the film is surely inherent in the source material. And it certainly looks as spectacular as you’d expect for a Ridley Scott film. Indeed, how he manages to make a film as ‘big’ as this for ‘just’ $108 million is quite astonishing, frankly (something he likewise achieved with Prometheus). You certainly get plenty bang for your buck. And yes its great to see Ridley back in the sci-fi groove now after so many decades. There are some amazing sets and shots in The Martian that reminded me of 2001, and hints at what a film like that might look like if done today. But that’s just it; 2001 would never get made today. We can do better visuals now than Kubrick could ever have dreamed of, but we cannot tell the same kind of story. There is no room for the awe, the strangeness, the alien-ness of space anymore. Its more cosy and familiar now. I don’t think there is any moment in The Martian where we doubt our hero will ever fail to survive, or we really feel the stark terror and loneliness of life alone on an alien world. We’re too busy smirking at disco music.

God that planetoid in Alien was so strange and alien… so dark and moody and dangerous and nightmarish. Mars looks spectacular enough but its just another desert, frankly. I guess I just prefer Scott’s more arthouse, darker, rawer works, those films with his flair for visuals coupled with a darker twist. They are inevitably more esoteric, less audience-friendly. Not necessarily better movies, I’ll admit that, certainly, but I do find even a flawed film like The Counsellor rather more interesting and rewarding. However some might say that I’m talking utter tosh and The Martian proves that Ridley is better when he keeps it simple. The box-office would seem to confirm that. The tone of the film just felt wrong, somehow. Maybe it was just that disco music. It rather worked in the book, but onscreen, it was just distracting, undermining any tension.

Maybe I’ll enjoy it more second time around. I just expected Ridley to stamp some of his darkness on the project but it just turned out light and fluffy and entertaining like the book. I expect that, knowing that now, I’ll react to the film better next time. But I’ll still wonder at what it might have been. Maybe he’s keeping a three-hour version under his hat for a Directors Cut edition that will add some of that darkness and awe. You never know with Ridley. Afterall, Kingdom of Heaven was pretty poor at the cinema, but its later extended version is one of the very best films he has ever made.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “The Martian (2015)

  1. gregory moss

    Nice review! As you know, I was pleasantly surprised by this film. Perhaps because I had such low expectations? Perhaps part of the reason for the lack of tension has something to do with Drew Goddard’s screenplay? I thought (the embarrassingly overrated) Cabin In The Woods also lacked any palpable sense of dread or tension (due mainly to the problematic structure of the script – but that’s another story) … 🙂

    1. I’ve never seen Cabin in the Woods- have spent years avoiding spoilers as it always seemed rated so highly that I’ve been keen to see it someday. You’ve just shot that down!

      The Martian is a good film but it could have been a great film. That said, it is a technically marvelous piece of work. That Mission Control set, for instance, was just amazing. It should be a good bet for a Production Design Oscar nod.

  2. Matthew McKinnon

    I was surprised to find myself going to see this in the cinema, as I haven’t enjoyed a Scott film in decades. But the positive buzz about this, and the fact that my wife was keen to watch it made us head out one afternoon.

    We were disappointed as well. I do think it’s Scott’s best film since forever, mainly because he works to a tight script that he hasn’t been able to ‘develop’ in his usual way (http://sex-in-a-sub.blogspot.co.uk/2010/05/robbing-from-poor-writer.html?m=1). But that script actually became the problem after a while: it’s so polished and so neat that it becomes wearing and clockwork. And every character gets their own cutesy one-liners and hero moments, at the expense of the desperation and loneliness that should be more a part of the story. It was too chirpy.

    That said, even though I agree with you overall, I’d still prefer to have more Scott film like this – based on a tighter un-fucked-about-with script than any more 150min bloated CG epics. I guess it’s finding the fight balance.

    Footnote: also, as a disco fan I did not like the cake-and-eat-it way it made fun of disco as ‘bad’ music, but then made full crowd-pleasing use of it in about ten scenes. Although the idea of a character who looks like Jessica Chastain and is into disco is one that will haunt my daydreams for a long time to come.

    1. Its all about extremes isn’t it- on the one hand you have Prometheus, which has a pretty fascinating core idea but turns into a confusing mess of plotholes and bizarre character actions, and on the other hand The Martian, which maintains the fascinating premise but keeps it too simple/formulaic. Thanks for the link by the way, that was a good read and a bit of an eye opener. Ridley has a record for being wrong of course- I’ll never understand his fascination with Deckard being a Replicant in Blade Runner, for example. Is part of the problem film fans’ preoccupation with the likes of Hitchcock and Wilder and Kubrick, the idea of the director as creative genius and central creator of a film?

  3. I liked The Martian very much. The situation of a man being imprisoned by nature, in the most hostile circumstances, created enough tension of its own, regardless of the soundtrack choices. One of the things I liked about his survival instincts, was his ability to harness lightness and humour to overcome seemingly insurmountable odds. The disco music helped him to reinforce that, so it made sense for the character and the story.

  4. The Martian is an interesting movie–not your typical Scott film in the least. Many of Scott’s themes are intact, yet there’s something different with this film than the other Ridley Scott films out there. I’m just wondering if he imprinted his feelings about his brother Tony’s death in the picture. I can feel the loneliness in the film. It’s in a stark contrast to Aliens or Gladiator. Interesting film, nonetheless.

  5. Pingback: The Martian (2015) | 100 Films in a Year

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s