Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002)

hp2Harry Potter returns with his second year at Hogwarts and a darker adventure than the first. Much darker. Indeed, it had me thinking of The Empire Strikes Back at one point, but by the films end most of the plot points are resolved and all is well, though it does make me wonder just how dark things are going to get later in the series (I gather things get pretty dark later on and if this  film is any indication…).

Released a year after the first film, such a quick turnaround for a major motion picture of some considerable scope is particularly impressive. I can only imagine the logistical nightmare and long hours that ensured it was released on time and largely maintained the quality of the first.  Indeed, it largely surpasses the first film technically (the effects work is clearly more ambitious), and yes many seem to feel its a better movie.  I’m not so sure about that, although my problems lie with the story (and therefore more with the original book itself).  Perhaps its inevitable, but the film seemed overly episodic and also rather over-long (perhaps the episodic nature didn’t help).  I also think that Chris Columbus’ direction is again sadly flat and workmanlike- the finale with the basilisk was awkwardly staged in particular, although perhaps the tight pre-production and filming schedule to ensure the release date had an impact on that. Oh, and the last moments with everyone clapping and hugging were particularly cringe-inducing,  too forced and manipulative (wet eyes everywhere, give me a break). Okay, I know I’m hardly the target audience for a film like this but after all the darkness before, it just felt out of place and jarring. I hope the other films don’t end with more of the same.

Good points, well, the young cast did well again (albeit Ron’s getting irritating with his wide eyes and screaming) but the adults are rather wasted here considering the talent on hand. Again, that’s likely a fault from the book. The new additions to the cast are very good- particularly Kenneth Brannagh’s  buffoon-wizard Gilderoy Lockhart and Jason Isaacs as the sinister Lucius Malfoy,  father of  creepy brat Draco Malfoy. I don’t believe Brannagh appears again in the later films, more’s the pity.

I also just feel myself starting to lose the plot again already with the overall story arc/mythos.  The Chamber of Secrets (a Chamber of Secrets With Very Few Secrets, far as I could gather) has been re-opened by a ghost from a diary possessing the diary’s reader, the ghost being, er, Voldemort? So its Voldemort’s childhood self as he was when a student at Hogwarts or his adult self here? But I though Voldemort was alive somewhere, hmm. That’s where I got confused. I’m assuming Voldemort is still Out There Somewhere and this ghostly version of his younger self is gone for good. And how exactly was this diary in the hands of Lucius Malfoy anyway? Maybe some of this stuff is clarified in later films, I’ll have to see…

4 thoughts on “Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002)

  1. I think the first two films suffer (at least to a small degree) from a perceived need to be hyper-faithful to the books, a concern which seemed to overwhelm any other. Of course all of the films are faithful, but the first two are pretty much “the book on screen” whereas later ones are adaptations. I think that’s what led the next one to be a lot of fans’ favourite book but least favourite movie, although for the more casual fan / mainstream viewer it’s one of the series’ best (perhaps the best).

    It’s a shame Branagh doesn’t get to be in it more, he’s fantastic. Lucius’ part just gets bigger though, and Isaacs is fantastic. Some of the adult cast never really get a sizeable role to live up to their abilities, sadly, but such quality casting at least pays off in moments here and there.

    1. I wonder if J K Rowling would ever confess, having seen what some actors bring to their roles (like Branagh here), to having second thoughts about her use of the characters when writing the books? I’m reminded of TV shows like BABYLON 5, in which the writing could be influenced by what actors brought to the roles as filming went on. Of course the books were written prior to the films so Rowling could never do it, but I do wonder if a little part of her watched the films thinking, gosh, wish I had done that differently or kept that character longer, seeing them onscreen. No doubt the fans would have had screaming fits if too much was changed.

  2. I enjoyed these films when I was younger. I always thought the fights were boring but I recall liking the characters. Plus, I am around the same age as Emma Watson! She is actually about two years older so I crushed on her likely assisting in the overall enjoyment. I know she admitted herself that the acting was poor on her behalf in the first few films but hey…I did not even notice at that time. The point that I wanted to make is that even at that age….I found the action scenes lacking. So I agree with the awkward staging!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s