Psycho (1960)

psychoAfter spending the week watching the first season of Bates Motel (great show, by the way), it seemed only fitting to re-watch that series’ inspiration, Hitchcock’s classic Psycho. I had the Blu-ray sitting on the shelf since I bought it cheap on Amazon several months ago.

There’s nothing new that can be said about this movie; I am sure it’s all been done, frankly. After all, how many books, never mind internet pages,  have been written about it, its themes and Freudian subtexts? For most people it’s Hitchcock’s best film, his signature piece and a game-changer for Hollywood and films in general (I’d agree with most of that, although my personal favourite of his remains the dark and endlessly fascinating Vertigo). There’s no doubt that its a classic, and a truly great movie.

Psycho has been so endlessly imitated and parodied, it must be rare for anyone to watch this film for the first time still innocent of its twists and genius conceits. There’s something rather sad about that; I can only imagine the impact this film had on the public back in 1960, but well recall how it shocked me as a kid watching it for the first time on tv (during a Christmas holiday season of his films on BBC2, I think). Its one of those films that, just when get comfortable thinking you watching a certain kind of film suddenly pulls the rug from under you and becomes something else. No-one ever forgets Psycho.

One thing I would note though is how astonishing the screenplay is.  Its a work of manipulative genius, tuned to perfection.   I’ve commented on this before, in that many modern films seem to get made with clearly unfinished scripts leaving all sorts of plot-holes and narrative problems. Film-makers like Hitchcock and Billy Wilder used to work so hard on their scripts, really nailing the film down on the page, thinking it through,  before moving on to the actual shoot. Perhaps the genius and craft of Psycho is indeed in Hitchcock’s direction, but I’d rather be inclined to suggest its actually in that incredible script.

2 thoughts on “Psycho (1960)

  1. Nice piece. I do agree though, how much more can anyone really say about the film. The television series on the other hand is quite fantastic. Season two so far has been quite good. Glad you are liking it.

  2. I haven’t seen Psycho in a very long time, but it is an exceptional film. I saw it pretty uninformed about what was going to happen (and I’d seen the godawful remake first, which must say something worrying about my memory!), so it was rewarding all round. I feel like it gets discussed/spoiled less than some other films, perhaps due to age, perhaps just coincidence, which works in the favour of a new viewer. Plus, when one gets spoiled it’s normally with “the big twist at the end”, and Psycho is unusual in having great turns at several other points — for my money, the end-of-act-one twist is a cleverer and bigger deal than the climactic reveal.

    Scripts are definitely modern Hollywood’s biggest problem. And it’s not that the writers aren’t good, not even that studios interfere too much, but that they keep setting release dates so far in advance, sometimes before there’s even a script at all. If you’re still writing once shooting starts, how can anyone think that will make a good, consistent, coherent movie? But then those types of films all make hundreds of millions of dollars regardless, and even the so-called flops don’t really flop (e.g. John Carter, The Lone Ranger), so what incentive is there to change?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s