Elysium (2013)

elysiumWatching Elysium I had the feeling I was watching a film where a dodgy script or shooting problems were being fixed during the editing process with questionable success. By which I mean the whole thing didn’t really work. The pace seems wrong, the editing awry, the intentions rather confused. There’s something wrong here- too many (frankly irritating) shots in  ‘slow motion’ in a vain attempt to add emotional resonance; a love story that doesn’t convince, protagonists that are one dimensional and under-developed without explained motivations.  Plot-points that race by without explanation. God knows the whole thing looks utterly gorgeous, a huge budget, A-list cast, with seamless effects and slick design involving none other than Syd Mead. This should be a classic, but instead its rather a dud, possibly my biggest disappointment of 2013.

I expected rather more of Neill Blomkamp, particularly in mind of his excellent District 9, one of the most notable sci-fi films of the past decade.

At its heart, Elysium is the story of the chasm between rich and poor, a story that dates back  in sci-fi films as far back as the great Metropolis, a film that did the job much better as it turns out. Elysium is a utopia, a space station in orbit that can be seen by the impoverished millions on Earth. On Elysium the rich and the beautiful live long (possibly endless?) lives free of hunger, pain and sickness, with each household having a miracle medical machine that cures all ills and injuries. It looks very clean, very idyllic. But beyond all that, we know nothing of Elysium. We know nothing of the citizens life of privilege, what they do all day, what political system operates.  We don’t spend any time with the folks of Elysium to understand how they live, how they feel about the poor left behind on Earth.  We don’t really even know if they depend on the labour of those left behind on Earth to maintain their utopian lives; its  a plot point never developed, like so many others, another thread that when pulled starts to unravel the entire enterprise.

Our allegiance is obviously with the poor masses left behind on Earth. Here they have no miracle health machines, jobs appear scarce and unrewarding, poverty and crime are everywhere. Terrorist freedom fighters hijack transports to illegally emigrate to Elysium, but how they finance or organise/act out such efforts is never explained (getting a shuttle into orbit and onto the station is hardly as simple as crossing a border or smuggling aboard a freight lorry, but its depicted as if its easy enough to be a constant thorn of  Elysium’s security force).

A (sincere enough) Matt Damon stars as Max, who in rather pointless flashbacks spent much of his childhood staring up at Elysium in the sky wishing he could go there. Adult Max is still on Earth, with a criminal record to his name and stuck in a manufacturing job in a factory building law enforcement robots (shades of the recent Total Recall remake there). Max meets childhood friend Frey (Alice Braga) for the first time in years; she’s a doctor now, working in a hospital. Unknown to Max, Frey has a daughter who is terminally ill.  An accident at work results in Max being irradiated with only days to live.  His only hope is to reach Elysium, and he falls into his old criminal crowd, working for terrorists who recruit him in a raid on a high-ranking Elysium citizen who runs Max’s factory, John Carlyle. Carlyle has intel that Max and his cohorts can use to gain entry to the orbital station.

elysium-elysium-on-the-curveThe complication is that Elysium’s Defense Secretary Jessica Delacourt (a criminally-underused Jodie Foster) has a scheme in place with Carlyle to instigate a coup in Elysium, placing Delacourt as president. Delacourt’s reasons for this act are vague, other than frustrations with the current leaders of the station, who she sees as weak and ineffectual against the tide of immigrants harassing her orbital paradise.  In anycase, the data that Max manages to steal from Carlyle is the very data she needs to rewrite the stations operating system and put herself in charge. Being able to rewrite the stations operating system, this data in the wrong (terrorist) hands could also undo the utopia completely and bring the miracle health machines to the poor masses on Earth.

Cue several high-octane actions sequences that, while impressively staged are also rather boring. The problem being we don’t really care.  My summary of the plot makes it seem an interesting film but there’s something wrong. Rather than be a genuine bad guy/criminal that eventually turns good in order to save the masses, Max is instead just a misfortunate who always had a heart of gold, there is little character arc here for him. Likewise Delacourt is a one-dimensional villain; we don’t really understand her motivations beyond a superficial level. How interesting this film might have been had Max been a criminal always out for himself in the cut-throat world he lives in, who finally learns to change in order to save those around him. He doesn’t change, he’s always just been a good boy at heart. Likewise if we had understood who Delacourt was, her allegiances to the system, her loved ones she strives to protect by maintaining their lives of privilege, we might have sympathised with her a little. Instead a complex premise is made simple black & white and weakened. When Delacourt finally meets her end, it happens almost in passing, incidental, as if it means nothing. It does the casting of someone like Foster in the role a real disservice. Indeed, all the parts here seem thankless, from Max to Frey to Elysium sleeper agent Kruger (Sharlto Copley, so wonderful in District 9), as one-dimensional a villain as you ever likely to meet in a movie. I expected Kruger (betrayed and sacked at one point by his masters) to switch allegiances and assist Max in his quest but no, he’s just a dumb soldier for hire with an aptitude for guns. Another wasted character arc. Which sums up the film really. Its pretty but vacuous. I had hoped for more.

5 thoughts on “Elysium (2013)

  1. Yeah, it’s a weird one.

    I’ve seen this twice now, when I didn’t really intend to see it at all: I quite liked ‘District 9’, but I thought it was massively over-rated [it runs out of ideas about halfway through, and substitutes noise and grinding unpleasantness in their place, but no-one seems to care about that]. And the trailers for ‘Elysium’ looked like some late 90s DTV SF thriller, so I wasn’t really amped for it at all.

    But I went along to see it on a big screen one afternoon because I was at a loose end, and because I had such low expectations I was quite pleasantly surprised. I mean, it wasn’t actually good, but it had enough things in it to keep me interested. Mainly FX things, which looked stunning on a massive screen. And as an editor, I’ve learned to appreciate films where you can quite clearly see what you could do to fix them [in this case, lose the explanatory titles upfront, change the bad music, lose all the flashbacks and it’s already 30% better]. But I thought it was alright.

    But my wife and I watched it again the other night as a rental, and it was pretty boring. The big-screen impact really makes or breaks It: things that looked clever [the police robots, the physicality of the fight scenes, the amazing weapons] just looked meh.

    I really wanted to see the film continue to the point where all those shuttles with the med-bays get trashed in the riots as people all try to use them at once, and Elysium is over-run and no-one has any nice things at all. Because the film hasn’t thought out anything suggesting any other scenario.

    1. It was a really annoying movie! Such a wasted opportunity considering the talent involved. I hate it when a film just doesn’t seem thought-through properly. I mean, I don’t write movies but I’d like to think I could have made valid suggestions during the pre-production process or when the script was being worked on. So why can’t the professionals being paid six-figure sums not see it also? Besides, I find it strange that this film could get through test-screenings without such stuff being raised. Most irritating is the waste of the cast and their inability or lack of interest in fixing all that stuff. Jodie Foster is a good actress and not a stranger to working behind the camera- the utter one-dimensionality and waste of her character just perplexed me.

  2. I totally agree on the writing: though these days it feels to me like these ‘auteur’ writers know exactly what they’re doing and exactly what cliches a studio needs to see in a script , what boxes need to be ticked, in order to green light it. So they write compromised – or plain bad – scripts from the off, and thus the films never completely satisfy. Which is why the writing and characterisation on these massive budget movies [Pacific Rim, Elysium, Gravity – to a lesser extent, but still – and of course Avatar] is often so disappointing.

    It’s probably unwise to wish for an old-school studio system where proven writers are kept on a retainer in order to polish scripts with some degree of sophistication, but I can’t imagine it would be worse than the tone-deaf output of some of today’s ‘visionary’ [i.e. good with special effects] directors when they write their own material.

    As for Elysium, I’m pretty sure it went through a lot of changes before release: Jodie Foster’s entire performance is dubbed, which does her no favours. I believe the character originally had a French accent, but I guess that didn’t test too well in Ohio.

  3. There seemed to be a lot of hope pegged on this one (I guess after District 9) and then it almost disappeared without a trace. I saw the trailer and it didn’t really engage me, and it sounds like the final film is as bungled as I felt the trailer implied.

    It sounds like there’s a good concept there too, which is always a shame to see wasted. Plus, a good chunk of America (in particular) could do with a film that puts the rich/poor divide on screen for them to think about… though most of that nation are never going to relate to something as allegorical as sci-fi in that way, are they?

  4. Yep – pretty much agree with everything you said. A major disappointment – especially after the trailers made such a hopeful impression that it was gonna be good – or at least not a complete waste of time …

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s